The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c9.58

c9.58

³ Of the two published Narêgal inscriptions, one purports to be dated, quite impossibly, in the Saumya *saṁvatsara*, *Śaka-Saṁvat* 872 (current), = A.D. 949-50, and the other, equally so, in the Sâdhâraṇa *saṁvatsara*, *Ś.-S.* 872 (expired), = A.D. 950-51. According to the transcription in the *Carn.-Désa Inscr.*, the third purports, more reasonably, to be dated in the Târaṇa *saṁvatsara*, *Ś.-S.* 1026 (expired), = A. D. 1104-1105: but this date is also inadmissible, because of the latter date for the father, Âchugi II.; and, that it is not the date really given in the original, is rendered probable by the fact that, in its representation of another of his records, the *Carn.-Désa Inscr.* (Vol. I, p. 633) connects the Saumya *saṁvatsara* with *Ś.-S.* 1052 (expired), instead of 872 (current).