History of the Pallavas of Kanchi c7.s1.50

c7.s1.50

In the present state of research definite conclusions on the question seem unattainable. It is, however, quite plain that the theory of foreign origin of the Pallavas, especially that which gives them a Parthian or Persian home, is without foundation. The theory that contents itself with connecting the Pahlava minister with the Pallavas of Kāñchī although having an air of plausibility is hardly acceptable as no evidence is forthcoming of the eastward migration of the Pahlavas in the second century. The next alternative is to regard them as indigenous to the country. In doing so we have to establish first whether the Pallavas should be regarded as a family or a tribe. Those who contend that the modern Kallar and the Pallis are descended from the Pallavas are labouring under the impression that the Pallavas constituted a big tribe; there seems to be little evidence for the assumption. In the Pallava inscriptions themselves we scarcely come across with the word Kurumba as a dynastic surname of any of the Pallava kings. It is therefore improbable that the identification of the Kurumbas with the Pallavas postulated by certain scholars rests on sound foundation.