History of the Khaljis, A.D. 1290–1320 c19.23

c19.23

In his conquests, in befriending enemies and in administrative reforms 'Alāuddīn can be compared to one of the greatest emperors of India, Akbar: So far as the policy of territorial aggrandizement is concerned both 'Alāuddīn and Akbar believed in the principal that might is right. Like Akbar after him 'Alāuddīn also firmly believed that "A monarch should ever be intent on conquest otherwise his neighbours rise in arms against him."¹⁰ Again like a shrewd diplomat 'Alāuddīn followed the policy of befriending his enemies as Akbar adopted in case of the Rajputs. Some of the Rajput states which had always fought the Muslim rulers in India became Akbar's best supporters. In the same way some of the Deccan kings, in whose country 'Alāuddīn's generals had carried fire and sword became his loyal supporters. 'Alāuddīn was perhaps the first Muslim ruler who left Hindu kings in their positions provided they paid tribute. In certain spheres 'Alāuddīn showed great originality, and some of his military and revenue reforms were adopted by prominent kings long after. Sher Shah adopted most of 'Alāuddīn's military reforms, such as direct recruitment, branding of horses and cash payment. Measurement of land and assessment of land revenue on the basis done by 'Alāuddīn are also found in Todarmal's system, in the time of Sher Shah and Akbar. The only objectionable thing in 'Alāuddīn's administration is that it was based exclusively on force. While the various revenue, administrative and economic reforms of Sher Shah and Akbar were only done to benefit the people, 'Alāuddīn took harshest steps just in the name of defence of the country and even for his own glory.