Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India c12.s6.1

The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India c12.s6.1

Language
English

c12.s6.1

One of the immediate causes of Partition was the Direct Action or the unleashing of widespread communal violence in the country. But there was nothing new or unique about it. The history of communal riots is synchronous with the advent of Muslims in India. For the next hundreds of years invaders and rulers committed all sorts of atrocities on the people and the atmosphere was surcharged with aggression and violence. But one day the Hindus struck back. The opportunity came when Nasiruddin Khusrau Shah ascended the throne of Delhi (1320). Khusrau Shah was a Hindu convert. He belonged to the Barwari class of Gujarat and they were known for their bravery.⁶⁴ Qutbuddin was very much enamoured of him. It was customary in those days, says Ibn Battuta, that when a Hindu accepted Islam, the sultan used to present him with a robe of honour and a gold bangle.⁶⁵ Khusrau Khan pleaded with the sultan that some of his relations wanted to embrace Islam and in this way collected about 40,000 Barwaris in the capital.⁶⁶ One day they killed Qutbuddin Khalji and started rioting and killing.⁶⁷ Copies of the Quran were torn to pieces and used as seats for idols which were placed in the niches (*mehrabs*) of the mosques. A later but otherwise reliable chronicler, Nizamuddin Ahmad, says that some mosques were also broken.⁶⁸ The Barwaris had known the Muslims breaking temples and destroying religious books of the Hindus. This they had done on a large scale in Gujarat itself about twenty years ago.⁶⁹ In the Delhi rioting, they paid the Muslims back in the same coin. Their King Khusrau Shah even forbade cow-slaughter.⁷⁰ But in the end this rioting was brought under control by Gazi Malik.