Ancient Indian Colonies in the Far East (Vol. I: Champa; Vol. II: Suvarnadvipa) v1.c9.s2.12

v1.c9.s2.12

1. ‘एकार’ is doubtful.
2. Finot reads ‘विष्ट’—apparently a slip for विसृष्ट which is clear on the estampage.
3. I do not understand the meaning of the word ‘करिणोव्वरेण’ and ‘नान्यके’. The last, used along with sons and brothers, seems to denote ‘kinsmen’ or ‘relatives’. Bergaigne takes it in the sense of ‘no one else’, but the use of the plural ‘तृतेषु’ in the absolute construction compels us to reject this view. That participle, being in the plural, requires at least one more subject other than ‘भ्रातरि’ and ‘पुत्रे’.