The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v2.c28.293

v2.c28.293

¹ First noticed by Cunningham, *ASR*, Vol. XXI, p. 82, No. 52. It was then published by Hultzsch in *ZDMG*, Vol. XL, pp. 51-54. Next Kielhorn edited it in *EI*, Vol. I, pp. 207-14, under the name *Bateśvar stone inscription*. But in fn. 2, p. 207, he expressed the opinion that this inscription was possibly the same as the one noticed above by Cunningham as found on the bank of a lake at 'Bagbari.' In a note (fn. 1, p. 158, *JASB*, 1895, Vol. XLIV, Part 1), V. A. Smith and Hoey confirmed this suspicion that the label attributing the stone to Baṭeśvar in the Agra district is wrong, and that there can be no doubt that it was really found at Baghari.