The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v2.c31.100

v2.c31.100

⁵ *Ibid*, pp. 297 and 302, V. 6. Kielhorn at first took Sindhurāja to mean king of Sind, but later on in the ‘*Errata and Corrigenda*’ (*ibid*, p. 481) said “possibly the king of Sind but more probably Sindhurāja of Mālva.” As Muñja seems to have died some time between 994 and 997 A. D. (*ibid*, p. 228), there is no inherent impossibility in Sindhurāja of Mālava being a contemporary of Cāmuṇḍa. But in view of the fact that Mūlarāja also fought with a Sindhurāja I prefer his former view. See also the Arthuna stone inscription of Paramāra Cāmuṇḍarāja (A. D. 1080) where Sindhurāja must be taken to mean ‘prince of Sind.’ See *EI*, Vol. XIV. The *Kumārapāla-carita* says that Cāmuṇḍa killed Sindhurāja in battle; see I, 31.