Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

The Colas c19.79

The Cōḷas c19.79

Language
English

c19.79

²¹ Contra *ARE*, 1908 II 56.
22. 92 of 1892; 172 of 1894.
24. Text: ‘*mun-tanakkudaindu*,’ apparently rendered by Hultzsch into ‘which had previously belonged to him.’
25. ‘*Ilañjiridenṟeṇṇi uḷangoḷ tannāḍu tannuṟavoḍum pugundu*’ is the text.
26. Or daughter. The text has *kādali*.
27. Text ‘*ularnda*.’ Hultzsch has ‘perished’; but see later.
28. The text is ‘*Kannaran-vaḻi-vandurai-koḷa-viḻat-taraiśan-āgiya*,’ which Hultzsch translates into ‘who had come to Kannaran (Kṛshṇa) and taken up (his) abode (with him).’ *Uṟai* means in the context ‘pride,’ ‘glory.’ The point seems to be that Madanarāja, though a Rāshṭrakūṭa or, more generally, a Karṇāṭa by descent, became king of Ceylon.
29. Ch. 55 vv. 24-29.
30. CV. Ch. 56, vv. 1-6.
31. 92 of 1892 where he is only called ‘king of the Ceylonese.’ 221 of 1894.
32. Geiger CV. ii. p. xxi.
33. CV. Ch. 56, v. 7.
34. *ibid*, vv. 8-10
35. *ibid*, vv. 11-14.
36. PK. p. 113.
37. CV. *ibid*., vv. 13-15.
38. Cf. Hultzsch *SII*. iii, p. 53.
39. *ibid*. 3 Decr. A.D. 1046.
40. *ibid*; also CV. 56, v. 16.
41. Cf. Hultzsch—*JRAS*. 1913, pp. 519-21 where the opinions expressed by him in *SII*. iii are withdrawn.
42. Jagatīpāla’s queen and her daughter Līlāvatī escaped later on from their captivity in the Cōḷa country, CV. Ch. 59 vv. 23-4.
43. *SII*. iii. 29. *JRAS*, 1913, p. 519.
44. 87 of 1895; 270 of 1915, both of the ninth year.
45. *SII*. iii p. 59; 612 of 1912, (*SII*. iv 1408).
46. *Virarpaḍaik-kalingar-man*, l. 12 of *SII*. iii 29.
47. Supposing that a Vīra-Salāmēgha ‘perished in a hot battle’ (*SII*. iii p. 56) with Rājādhirāja, Hultzsch distinguishes from him the ‘*kalingar-man*’ of the same name of the Rājēndra inscriptions (*JRAS*. 1913 p. 520), and connects the latter with Trilōkasundarī, a Kalinga queen of Vijayabāhu I, A.D. 1054-1109, and suggests that her nephew Kitti-sirī-mēgha may have been named after Vīra-Salāmēgha. He also suggests that the Pāṇḍya Mānābharaṇa who was decapitated by Rājādhirāja was the ancestor of that Mānābharaṇa who was the nephew and son-in-law of Vijayabāhu I; and that Śrī Vallabha Madanarāja, the Ceylonese opponent of Rājādhirāja, was the ancestor of his namesake Śrī Vallabha, a third nephew and son-in-law of Vijayabāhu I. Arguments from the similarity of common names cannot be final; and Hultzsch has not considered the relation between the Mānābharaṇa whose sons were captured by Rājēndra and his namesakes.
48. Vide p. 221 *ante*.