The Colas c23.190

c23.190

¹¹⁹ 80 of 1928.
155. 74 of 1918; 463 of 1921.
156. He is said to be of the Kāṭṭuk-kuḍi, Kāḍava line in 381 of 1921, n-d.
157. 63 of 1919.
158. 487 of 1921.
159. 197 of 1905.
160. 486 of 1921, of the eleventh year of Kōpperuñjinga, from Tiru-veṇṇainallūr, records the re-engraving of an older inscription of the 12th year of Tribhuvanacakravartin Rājarājadēva recording a gift by Āṭkolli Kāḍavarāya for the birth of a son.
161. No. 488-a of 1902, 508 of 1902; *ARE.* 1937|8 II 41 (496 of 1937-8).
162. 296 of 1912 of which v. 3 forms 178 of 1921. The theory of two Kōpperuñjingas (*SII.* xii Intrn. p. viii and no. 130) is both unnecessary and unwarranted by the sources.
163. *ARE.* 1913, II 66 says that Kākatīyas were expelled from the south as a result of this battle by Kāḍava II. There is no basis for this statement unless it be one stanza in the *praśasti* which has reference to vaḍamannar, northern kings. This verse stands in no relation whatever to the Sēvūr fight, and it gives us the precious historical information that the 'northern kings' who did not come and make obeisance to the Kāḍava, could not find even a hill or a forest to which they could fly for refuge!
164. 531 of 1902.
165. 312 of 1902.
166. 477, 479 of 1921.
167. 313 of 1902 (Yr. 17), 133 of 1900 (Yr. 28).
168. 73 of 1906 (Yr. 38).
169. 390 of 1902 (Yr. 11).
170. 534 of 1902 (Yr. 25).
171. 73 of 1906 (Yr. 38).
172. 414 of 1909 (Yr. 6).
173. 114 of 1900 (Yr. 3); 538 of 1902 (Yr. 27).
174. *Ante* p. 266.
175. 536 of 1902 (Yr. 10).
176. 161 of 1902.
177. Cf. the undated inscriptions of Naralōkavīra—*Studies* vii; *ante* p. 333.
178. 8 of 1900.
179. *SII*, i, 75; *EI.* vi, pp. 331—3.
180. 107 of 1900; *SII.* vii, 119.
181. See in particular 440 of 1913; 223 of 1904; 56 of 1922 (Yr. 13); 483 of 1908 (Yr. 18); 115 of 1900 (Yr. 20); 516 of 1902 (Yr. 27); 435 of 1913 (Yr. 35); 489 of 1912 (Yr. 40). Also n. 35 *ante*.