The Colas c27.128

c27.128

92. 490 of 1912. It should be noted, however, that there is a discrepancy between the *śiṟu aparādam* of the earlier inscription and the theft of jewels of the later record; one wonders if that could be called a minor offence. Again, the earlier record mentions only a fine of 20 *kāśus* for the offence in the temple, and says nothing about the confiscation of the house and servants. It may be that the same person committed a second offence and lost the house and servants in consequence, these being all that were left to him after his lands had been sold on the prior occasion.