The Early History of India, from 600 B.C. to the Muhammadan Conquest, including the Invasion of Alexander the Great c29.207

c29.207

² It is impossible to discuss the Mo-la-p'o problem fully within the limits of a note. References are : Hiuen Tsang (Beal, ii, pp. 260–70 ; Watters, ii, pp. 242–8) ; Cunningham, *Anc. Geogr.*, pp. 489–94 ; Stein, transl. *Rājatar.*, vol. i, p. 66; Max Müller, *India, What can it Teach us?* p. 288 ; Hoernle (*J. R. A. S.*, 1903, p. 553) ; Vincent Smith (*Z. D. M. G.*, 1904, pp. 787–96) ; Burn (*J. R. A. S.*, 1905, p. 837) ; Grierson (*J.R.A.S.*, 1906, p. 95) ; Burgess (ibid., p. 220 ; *Ind. Ant.*, 1905, p. 195) ; Sylvain Lévi (*Journal des Savants*, Oct., 1905, pp. 544–8). The text, which differs from that in the first edition, is based on consideration of all the above-mentioned publications. Some special points may be noted. Mo-la-p'o did not include Bhinmāl (Bhilmāl, Bhinnamāla, Bhillamāla, also called Śrīmāl), repre-