A History of Sanskrit Literature: Classical Period, Vol. I c5.31

c5.31

¹ The literature on the subject, which is discussed threadbare without yielding any definite result, is bulky and still growing. The various views, however, will be found in the following : G. Huth, *Die Zeit des Kālidāsa* (diss.), Berlin 1890 ; B. Liebich, *Das Datum des Candragomin's und Kālidāsa's*, Breslau 1903, p. 28, and in *Indogerm. Forschungen*, XXXI, 1912-13, p. 198 f. ; A. Gawronski, *The Digvijaya of Raghu*, Krakau 1914-15 ; Hillebrandt, *Kālidāsa*, Breslau 1921 ; Pathak in *JBRAS*, XIX, 1895, pp. 35-43 and introd. to *Megha-dūta* ; Keith in *JRAS*, 1901, p. 578, 1905, p. 575, 1909, p. 433, *Ind. Office Cat.*, Vol. 2, pt. ii, p. 1201, *SD*, p. 143 f. ; also references cited in Winternitz, *HIL*, III, p. 40 f. W. F. Thomas, in *JRAS*, 1918, pp. 118-22, makes an attempt to revive the Dinnāga legend.