Studies in the History of Sanskrit Poetics v1.c12.32

v1.c12.32

² see, for instance, their respective views on *rīti*, *guṇa* and *doṣa*, on *alaṃkāra* (which last element Daṇḍin does not distinguish fundamentally from *guṇas*, ii 3), on *vakrôkti* (Bh ii 85 and D ii 362), their respective order of treatment of *alaṃkāras* (which Bhāmaha deals with in successive groups, while Daṇḍin's thirty-five independent poetic figures are given as if they are well recognised), Daṇḍin's minute and fine differentiation of infinite sub-species of individual figures, their respective treatment of *yamaka*, *upamā*, *utprekṣā*,