Studies in the History of Sanskrit Poetics v2.c79.62

v2.c79.62

37 The text is obviously corrupt. Abhinava reads *suprasiddhābhidhāyinā*, instead of *suprasiddhā dhātunā ca* which is unintelligible. Read also *loka-dharma* instead of *loka-karma*. Hemacandra explains : *yasminnanyathā-sthito'pi tathā-sthita evārthaḥ pratibhāti. so'rthavyaktiḥ*. He also points out that this *guṇa* of Bharata corresponds to Vāmana's *artha-guṇa arthavyakti* (defined as *vastu-svabhāva-sphuṭatvam* III. 2. 13), and would be equivalent to the poetic figure *jāti* or *svabhāvokti* of Daṇḍin and others. Mammaṭa p. 583 : *abhidhāsyamāna-svabhāvoktyalaṃkāreṇa vastu-svabhāva-sphuṭatva-rūpārthavyaktiḥ svīkṛtā*, but Viśvanātha would include it in *prasāda-guṇa*.