Studies in the History of Sanskrit Poetics v2.c89.2

v2.c89.2

abhaṅga-śleṣa 82 abhāvavādin, the school which denies dhvani 67 ; Bhā and Ud are not of this school 67 ; reactionary writers of this school 229 abhidhā, denotation of a word, 184f ; includes lakṣaṇā in Bh N 155, 234 ; its far-reaching function 157 ; as a means of generalisation 159 ; cannot comprehend rasa 170 ; as defined by different schools 184-5 ; in relation to vyañjanā 190f ; Dīrghavyāpāra-vādins on 192f ; as basis of vivakṣitānya-para-vācya dhvani 204, 321-2 ; postulated by Bh N 233 ; poetic figs as particular forms of 240 ; admitted by Agp 256 abhidheya (or saṃketita) artha 193 ; distinguished from vyaṅgyārtha 194 Abhihitānvaya-vādins 188f Abhinavagupta, his comm on Bh cited 3, 6*-19*, 20, 23*, 139 ; on the object of poetry 50-1 ; on pratibhā or śakti 53 ; on rītis and vṛttis 131; comments on Bhā’s vakrokti 136; interprets Daṇḍin’s idea of rasa 139-40; influence of Bh N on 159; maintains essentiality of rasa in poetry and in drama 160, 211, 224f, 283; criticises Bh N’s theory of rasa 164; his theory of rasābhivyakti (vyakti-vāda) 27, 165f, 171, 205*, 211, 224f; on previous existence of dhvani-theory 178; on the relation of indicated and suggested senses 195; defines citra-kāvya 201*; importance of his exposition of dhvani-theory 224, 227; Hc’s borrowings from 147*, 307; influence of his theories of rasa 325, 211