A History of Sanskrit Literature c17.s1.30

c17.s1.30

As the belief in transmigration has cast its shadow over Indian thought from pre-Buddhistic times, it is only natural that the conception of fate should be prominent in Sanskrit moral poetry. Here, indeed, we often read that no one can escape from the operation of destiny, but at the same time we find constant admonitions not to let this fact paralyse human effort. For, as is shown in the *Hitopadeça* and elsewhere, fate is nothing else than the result of action done in a former birth. Hence every man can by right conduct shape his future fate, just as a potter can mould a lump of clay into whatever form he desires. Human action is thus a necessary complement to fate; the latter cannot proceed without the former any more than a cart, as the *Hitopadeça* expresses it, can move with only one wheel. This doctrine is inculcated with many apt illustrations. Thus in one stanza of the *Hitopadeça* it is pointed out that "antelopes do not enter into the mouth of the sleeping lion"; in another the question is asked, "Who without work could obtain oil from sesamum seeds?" Or, as the *Mahābhārata* once puts it, fate without human action cannot be fulfilled, just as seed sown outside the field bears no fruit.