The History of Indian Literature c8.129

c8.129

⁴³ This is a confusion. The above-named Náráyaṇa wrote a commentary upon the Śáṅkháyana-Gṛihya; but the one who commented the Áśvaláyana-Śrauta-Sútra calls himself in the introduction a son of Narasiṅha, just as Náráyaṇa, the commentator of the Uttara-Naishadhíya, does, who, according to tradition (Roer, Pref., p. viii., 1855), lived some five hundred years ago. Are these two to be regarded as one and the same person? See *I. Str.*, 2, 298 (1869).