The History of Indian Literature c8.254

c8.254

⁹⁹ The Mahábháshya is not his authority in this case either, for it does not mention the Sátyáyanins in its comment on the *sútra* in question (iv. 3. 105). But Kaiyaṭa cites the Bráhmaṇas proclaimed by Sátyáyana, &c., as contemporaneous with the *Yájnavalkáni Bráhmaṇáni* and *Saulabháni Br.*, which are mentioned in the Mahábháshya (see, however, *I. St.*, v. 67, 68); and the Mahábháshya itself cites the Sátyáyanins along with the Bhállavins (on iv. 2. 104); they belonged, it would seem, to the north; see *I. St.*, xiii. 442.