A History of Indian Literature v2.c19.s6.t4.143

v2.c19.s6.t4.143

² Apart from this, it was translated into Chinese by Kumārajīva (406 A.D.), Bodhiruci (500-516) and Śīladharma (789). Kumārajīva also translated the Daśabhūmika-vibhāṣāśāstra, a commentary on the first two Bhūmis, by Nāgārjuna. *Cf.* Nanjio, Nos. 88 f., 105, 110, 1180, 1194; *Bagchi* I, 87, 103, 186, 197 f., 253, 257; *K. Watanabe* in *JRAS* 1907, 663 f. A Daśabhūmikleśacchedikā-Sūtra, which is said to have been translated as early as in the year 70 A.D., has not come down, but the translation by Fo Nien (388-417) is extant, s. Nanjio, No. 375; *Bagchi* I, 171 f.; *Rahder*, l.c., pp. iii, viii, 217 f. The work treats of the same subject as the Daśabhūmaka, but is not identical with it.