History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v1.c6.s45.8
History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v1.c6.s45.8
- Language
- English
v1.c6.s45.8
It appears that Asahāya probably wrote a commentary on the Manusmṛti also. A passage of the Sarasvatīvilāsa⁵¹¹ says that partition of dharma was approved of by smṛtikāras like Manu, Yājñavalkya, by their commentators, viz. Asahāya, Medhātithi, Vijñāneśvara and Aparārka and by writers of *nibandhas*, viz. the author of the Candrikā and others. Here the order in which the commentators are named requires that Asahāya like Medhātithi was known to be a commentator of Manu. This conclusion is to some extent corroborated by the fact that the Vivādaratnākara⁵¹² quotes with reference to Manu 9. 182 the words of Asahāya thereon. On Manu 8. 156 Medhātithi quotes the opinion of Asahāya.⁵¹³
Linked texts (5)
- Mānava Dharmaśāstra — Manu & Bhṛgu, Sanskrit
- Yājñavalkyasmṛti — Yājñavalkya, Sanskrit
- Vivādaratnākara — Caṇḍeśvara, Sanskrit
- Sarasvatīvilāsa — Pratāparudradeva, Sanskrit
- Smṛticandrikā (Āpadeva) — Āpadeva 1600, Sanskrit