History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v4.c63.1261

v4.c63.1261

¹¹⁷⁴ शूद्रापुत्रवत्प्रतिलोमासु । गौ. 28. 43; प्रतिलोमासु स्त्रीषु चोत्पन्नाश्चाभागिनः । विष्णुधर्मसूत्र 15. 37; अक्रमोढासुतश्चैव सगोत्राद्यस्तु जायते । प्रव्रज्यावसितश्चैव न रिक्थं तेषु चार्हति ॥ अक्रमोढासुतस्त्वृक्थी सवर्णश्च यदा पितुः । असवर्णप्रसूतश्च क्रमोढायां च यो भवेत् ॥ प्रतिलोमप्रसूता या तस्याः पुत्रो न रिक्थभाक् । ग्रासाच्छादनमत्यर्थं देयं तद्वन्धुभिर्मतम् ॥ बन्धूनामप्यभावे तु पित्र्यं द्रव्यं तदाप्नुयात् ॥ कात्या. (862-864) q. by दायभाग V. 14 p. 103, वि. र. p. 491, वि. चि. pp. 133-134, व्य. मयूख pp. 163-164. The word अक्रमोढासुत is interpreted in two ways: (1) If a brāhmaṇa married a kṣatriya girl first and then married a brāhmaṇa girl, both women became अक्रमोढा (as the procedure was against Manu III. 12). The son of the kṣatriya woman in such a case did not take the wealth of his father but only the son of the other woman took it. The other interpretation (given by the व्यवहारमयूख) is based upon the doctrine of परिवेदन, for which vide H. of Dh. vol. II. pp. 546-549 and Manu, III. 172. The son of a younger sister married before her elder sister and of the latter married after a younger one were both excluded from inheritance to their father. Kāt. (862) is quoted in *Natha v. Chotalal* 55 Bom. 1 at p. 8.