History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v4.c63.585

v4.c63.585

⁷⁰⁰ Compare Viṣṇu Dh. S. VI. 4 with the first proposition. Pāṇini (IV. 4. 21) derives *yācitaka* (in the sense 'yācitena nirvṛttam'). In *Saundanappa* v. *Shivbasawa* 31 Bom. 354 Mr. Justice Chandavarkar translates (at p. 361) Nār. IV. 108 and Kāt. (502-504), discusses the explanations of those passages by the Mit. on Yāj. II. 38 and holds that these incidents are even now applicable to contracts of debts by Hindu debtors and that neither the Interest Act (XXXII of 1839) nor the Indian Contract Act affects the ancient Hindu Law. It should be noted that 31 Mad. 250 and 53 Mad. 549 at p. 579 dissent from this view.