History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v4.c63.t2.245

v4.c63.t2.245

¹⁴³⁸ *Vide Kailasha Chandra v. Karuna Nath* 18 C. W. N. 477 where the above passages are considered at length and it is held that the paternal grand-uncle's daughter's son (though not expressly mentioned by the D. B.) is entitled to preference over the maternal uncle (who is expressly mentioned as an heir and a sapiṇḍa by D. B.), since the former offers a piṇḍa to the paternal great-grandfather of the owner to whom the owner was bound to offer a piṇḍa in which the owner participates after his own death, while the latter offers a piṇḍa to the maternal grandfather of the owner to whom the owner was bound to offer a piṇḍa in which, however, the owner did not participate after his death.