Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v6.c81.200

History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v6.c81.200

Language
English

v6.c81.200

If a person is unable owing to disease or accident or the like to perform a vrata personally he could get it performed through a *pratinidhi* (a representative) Certain rules were laid down about this It is stated in the Satyāṣāḍhaśrautasūtra¹³³ 'there is no pratinidhi (representative or substitute) in the case of the owner (the *Yajamāna*), the wife, the son, the (proper) place and time (for an act), the fire, the deity (to be invoked such as Agni, Indra), a rite and a text (to be prescribed for being employed in a rite)'. All religious acts are arranged in three classes, viz. *nitya* (obligatory), naimittika (to be performed when a certain *nimitta* or occasion arises or event happens) and kāmya (performed out of a desire to secure some object). Vide H. of Dh. vol. IV pp 60-61 note 150 for further details The Trikāṇḍamaṇḍana¹³⁴ has the following rules about *pratinidhi* in these three kinds of acts 'No pratinidhi (substitute) is allowed in the case of kāmya rites, a substitute is allowable in the case of nitya and naimittika rites; some recognized a substitute even in a kāmya rite after it is once begun; there is no substitute for a mantra or the deity or the fire (Gārhapatya, Āhavanīya or Dakṣiṇāgni), a *kriyā* (such as *prayāja*) or *īśvara* (the svāmin or yajamāna); some say that a substitute is not allowed in the case of (a prescribed) place or time An *agnihotrin* can substitute, (if his wife is dead &c) an image of her made of gold or kuśas but a woman cannot proceed with a rite putting forward some substitute or effigy in place of the husband.' If a person is unable, after undertaking a vrata, to carry it out, he should get it done by a representative Such representatives are: son, wife, brother, husband, a sister, a pupil, purohita (for dakṣiṇā) and a friend Paithīnasi¹³⁵ states that a wife might carry on the vrata undertaken by the husband and the husband may do so for the wife, if both are unable a stranger may carry it out, in this way there is no break of vrata Kātyāyana¹³⁶ says:—one who observes a fast for the sake of his father or mother, brother, husband and particularly for his guru secures one hundred-fold merit, if a person observes a fast on Ekādaśī in place of his maternal grand-father and the like they and their representative each obtain the full fruit thereof. These rules about pratinidhi apply to men of all *varṇas* ¹³⁷