Sexual Life in Ancient India: A Study in the Comparative History of Indian Culture v2.c20.101

v2.c20.101

¹ Besides all the forms that H. Lüders sets forth in his studies on the Ṛṣyaśṛṅga tale in the *Göttinger Nachr.* of 1897 and 1901, from India here belongs first of all the very interesting variation of the Ṛṣyaśṛṅga tale (mentioned, moreover, also by Lüders) in Hemacandra’s Pariśiṣṭaparvan, translated by Hertel, p. 29 ff. Cp. his *Nachweise*, 223, 224; Chavannes, *Cinq cents contes*, No. 453; Pālijātaka, Nos. 191, 523, 526; Oesterley’s Baital Pacchisi, pp. 16–18; Tawney’s Kathākoça, 179–183; Daçakum., p. 205 ff. and 4 together with the citations there; Winternitz, WZKM, xxiii, p. 119 ff.; id., *Gesch. d. ind. Lit.*, i, 344 f.; Jacobs, *Barlaam und Josaphat*, cxxx; Kuhn, *Abhandlungen d. Bayr. Akad.*, Bd. 20, pp. 80, 81; Dunlop-Liebrecht, 230, 462 f.; Liebrecht, *Zur Volkskunde*, pp. 112, 441; Liebrecht, *Übersetzung d. Barlaam u. Josaphat*, 220; Chauvin, iii, 104, 105; Boccaccio, “Prologue to the 4th Day”; Landau, *Die Quellen d. Dekameron* 2, 171, 223 ff.; Zambrini, *Libro di novelle antiche*, No. xxii; René Basset, *Contes pop. d’Afrique*, p. 127 f.; Sercambi, *Novelle*, ed. Régnier, p. 122 ff.; Hagen’s *Gesamtabenteuer*, ii, 41 ff.; i, p. lxxxiii, note 2; “Die Komödie des Hans Sachs” in Kürschners *Nationallit.*, “Hans Sachs’ Werke,” ii, 268 ff.; *Bibliothek d. Stuttgarter Liter. Vereins*, Bd. 28, p. 148 ff.; Pfeiffer’s *Germania*, Bd. 17, pp. 306 ff.; Cardonne, *Mélanges de Littérature Orientale* (à la Haye, mdccclxxxiii, p. 10 ff.); and so on. That Daṇḍin in his tale should have re-modelled the Ṛṣyaśṛṅga legend, as is assumed by Lüders and after him Hertel, I still hold to be a mistaken idea, although my views on Daṇḍin’s originality have greatly changed since my Daçakum. was published. I now credit him here, too, with little of