Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

The Administration of the Sultanate of Dehli c12.151

The Administration of the Sultanate of Dehlī c12.151

Language
English

c12.151

The soldier’s pay must have varied at different times. Under ‘Alā-u’d-dīn Khaljī a fully equipped cavalryman drew two hundred and thirty-four *tankahs* per annum.⁶ This figure, however, should be interpreted in terms of normal prices; because, to get a soldier at that figure, the sultan had to regulate prices severely. The extravagant Muḥammad bin Tughluq paid about five hundred *tankahs* with food, dress and fodder. It is not clear if the soldier received dress and food only when he was on active service or in normal times as well; the difference would be immaterial towards the end of the reign when the army was constantly employed against rebels. The *Masālik-u’l-abṣār* also gives the salaries of the officers: a *khān* was paid a lakh of *tankahs*, a *malik* fifty to sixty thousand, an *amīr* thirty to forty thousand, a *sipah-sālār* twenty thousand or so, and petty officials received one to ten thousand a year.⁷ Soldiers were paid directly by the state.¹ The nobles were given assignments during the greater part of the period, but the soldiers usually received their pay in cash.² The systems of assignment and valuation resulted in profit to the noble who often got much more than their official salary.³ These assignments were for the personal salary of the officers and did not include the pay of the soldiers.⁴ The regular troops, called wajhīs, constituted a standing army; irregulars, called ghair-wajhīs, were employed for short periods. Sometimes payment was made by an order on some local treasury; this cheque was called an iṭlāq and its holder an iṭlāqdār. This was only a method of payment and had no bearing on the status of the soldier.⁵ Fīrūz Shāh revived the assignment system for the soldiers to such an extent that he made it almost hereditary.⁶ He even allowed the old and aged soldiers to send their relations to musters and campaigns.⁷ It was under the Lodīs that the army became tribal and was attached to the nobles instead of being under the direct control of the sultan.⁸