Manual of Indian Buddhism c5.s2.45

Language: English

c5.s2.45

² Majjh. N. I, 426 ff.; 484; Samy. N. II, p. 222; Mil. P. 145. It is not easy to reconcile, unless by sophisms, this agnosticism with the words spoken by the Tathāgata in Samy. N. II, p. 232: „Puggalam passāmi param maraṇā Nirayam upapannan”. And how to explain another passage, Samy. N. III, p. 109, where the theory that the “khiṇāsavo ucchijjāti, na hoti paraṃ maraṇā” is rejected as being heterodox?

Previous: c5.s2.44
Next: c5.s2.46
Up: c5.s2

Cites (4)

Milindapañha — Pāli
Cūḷamālukyasutta — Pāli
Majjhimanikāya — Pāli
Saṃyuttanikāya — Pāli