A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy c11.62

c11.62

Babylonian mythology, p. 84. Bacon, quotation from, on the chain of Nature, p. 2; and the active life, p. 299. Bādarāyaṇa: his frequent borrowal from the Upanishads, p. 205. Baka Dālbhya, or Glāva Maitreya, the story of, pp. 21-22. Balāki and King Ajāśatru, dialogue between, p. 251. Bāṇa, the name of the body in Praśna, p. 90. Beatific calculus, pp. 26, 301; beatific consciousness and Brahman, p. 144. Beatificism, the theory of, p. 300. Beatitude, various conceptions of, p. 213. Beg not, the rule of life for the ascetic, p. 296. Being, and Not-Being, conceptions of, in the Ṛigveda, p. 3; Āruṇi's idea of, compared with that of Green, p. 55; Being conceived cosmologically, psychologically, biologically, morally, and metaphysically, p. 55; Being, as the beginning of all things, pp. 85-87; Being in Parmenides, p. 104. Belief, the necessity of, p. 257. Berecynthia of the systems of philosophy, p. 178. Berkeley, Appearance in the doctrine of, p. 232; quotation from the ‘Treatise’ regarding the primacy of Mind, pp. 119-120. Bhagavadgītā: its attempt to synthesise the truths of Upanishadic philosophy, p. 1; its theistic reconciliation of Sāmkhya and Yoga, p. 18; its borrowings from the Katha, Muṇḍaka and Śvetāśvatara Upanishads, pp. 27-28; castes created according to qualities and works, p.59; conception of God as the A of the Indian alphabet, p. 105; its theory that temperaments are due to the kind of food eaten, p. 114; description of the Two Paths, p.159; on holding the body erect, p. 187; compared to nectar, p. 195; and the Upanishads, relation of, p. 195; its theistic-mystic philosophy, p.198; and the Upanishads, antagonism between, p. 198; religion of, not derived from the teaching of Ghora Aṅgirasa, p. 203; and Chhāndogya, a similarity, p. 204; on the Mutable and Immutable Persons, p. 207; doctrine of Māyā in, p. 228; and the doctrine of autonomy, p. 292; and Kant, p. 292; reconciliation of action with actionlessness, p. 298; and the Īśopanishad, on the achievement of actionlessness, p. 298; and Chhāndogya, enumeration of virtues, p. 308; on the conditions of imparting spiritual wisdom, p. 334; its conflicting views about Buddhi as the faculty of God-realisation, p. 340.