The Conception of Buddhist Nirvana c3.4

c3.4

XVII Some Minor Points Explained 150 XVIII The Third Stricture Of Bhāvaviveka Answered. The Denial Of One View Does Not Imply The Acceptance Of The Other 152 XIX Examination Of Bhāvaviveka’s Formal Argument Against The Sāmkhya 156 XX Bhāvaviveka’s Argument Assailed From The Standpoint of Formal Logic 159 XXI Another Attempt of Bhāvaviveka To Vindicate His Argument 162 XXII Bhāvaviveka Also Avails Himself Of The Argument That For The Monist All Individual Existence is Unreal. 167 XXIII Another Formal Error In The Syllogism Of Bhāvaviveka 174 XXIV The Madhyamika Repudiates His Opponent On Principles Admitted As Valid By The Same Opponent 175 XXV Logical Refutation On The Basis Of Facts Admitted By only One Party 177 XXVI Denial of Causality Through A Separate Substance 178 XXVII Combined Causality Denied 181 XXVIII No Pluralistic Universe Without Causation 181 XXIX Causality Through The Will of God 182 XXX Mahāyāna & Hīnayāns Contrasted 183 XXXI The Direct and Indirect Meaning of Buddha’s Words 188 XXXII How Is The Moral Law to be Vindicated In An Unreal World 190 XXXIII The Twelve-Membered Causal Series Refers To The Phenomenal World 200 XXXIV Controversy About The Validity of Logic 203 XXXV Controversy With The Buddhist Logician Continued 211 XXXVI Critique Of The Notion of an Absolute Particular Point-Instant 215