A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c33.295.1

v2.c33.295.1

1 Cf. Ca.Śā.1. See on Su.Śā.1: A. Comba (1991): 67–71; R.F.G. Müller (1951): 81–86 (German translation), (1956a); Vṛddhatrayī 202–206. 2 See the various explanations in Dalhaṇa’s commentary. 3 See on Su.Śā.1.4: A. Roṣu (1978): 136, 153–154. 4 See A. Roṣu (1978: 134), who says that the same series is found in the Sāmkhyakramadīpikā, a commentary on the Tattvasamāsa (Roṣu refers to M. Müller, n.d.: *264–265). See on the Tattvasamāsa: G.J. Larson and R.S. Bhattacharya (1987): 32–35, 315–320, on the Kramadīpikā: the same, 321–326. 5 See Dalhaṇa’s comments on these various points of view, which may be adopted in medical thought; he says that Gayadāsa was of the opinion that all these views should be taken into consideration collectively. See on the svabhāvavāda, kālavāda, yadrcchāvāda, and niyativāda: F.O. Schrader (1983). See on the svabhāvavāda and kālavāda: V.M. Bedekar (1961); L. Silburn (1955): 132–135, 137–142. See on the svabhāvavāda and yadrcchāvāda: M. Hiriyanna (1957): 71–78. See on svabhāva: O. Strauss (1911). See also P.V. Sharma (1989a): 19. Compare: Śvetāśvataropaniṣad 1.2, where kāla, svabhāva, niyati and yadrcchā are mentioned; Mahābhārata, Śāntiparvan 179 (ed. Poona). 6 See on karmapuruṣa, a term occurring in the Suśrutasaṃhitā in this passage only: Dalhaṇa ad Su.Śā.1.3, 16 and 17, Śā.3.4, Śā.4.3; R.F.G. Müller (1952a): 299, (1958): 127; A. Roṣu (1978): 146–147. 7 Cf. Ca.Śā.4.36–40; Su.Sū.35.37–38; 45.207–209. 8 Cf. Ca.Śā.4.12. 9 Cf.