Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c33.360

A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c33.360

Language
English

v2.c33.360

110 See on the treatment of leucoderma (śvitra): *K. Biswas (1956). 111 Cf. Ca.Ci.7.162–172. 112 Cf. Cikitsākalikā 208–211; Soḍhala’s Gadanigraha, prayogakhaṇḍa, ghṛtādhikāra 72–76 (from Bheḍa). 113 Ḍalhaṇa follows Jejjata and Gayadāsa, who, although regarding the two formulae as not being authoritative (anārṣa), yet accept and explain them. Compare on mahānīlaghṛta: Gadanigraha, prayogakhaṇḍa, ghṛtādhikāra 77–86ab (from Bheḍa). 114 See Su.Ci.2.86cd–94ab. 115 Cf. Cakradatta, kuṣṭha 133–135. 116 See Ḍalhaṇa on the interpretations of the term mahākuṣṭha in the chapter title. 117 See on mantha: Su.Sū.46.385; Śārṅgadharasaṃhitā II.3.9–10ab. Compare Cakra ad Ca. Sū.6.28; Śivadāsasena ad Ca.Sū.23.38; Ḍalhaṇa ad Su.U.64.44. 118 Cf. Su.Sū.45.194cd–197ab. 119 Cf. Su.Sū.44.28–30; 45.187cd–192ab; 46.433. 120 Cf. Su.Sū.44.31–34. 121 Ḍalhaṇa calls it a lauharasāyana. Cf. Ca.Ci.1³.15–23 (lauhādirasāyana). 122 Compare the khadira preparations of the Carakasaṃhitā (Ci.26.206–214). 123 Cf. Su.Ni.6. 124 Cf. Ca.Ci.6.15ab. 125 Cf. Ca.Ci.6.15cd. 126 Cf. Ca.Ci.6.18–24. 127 Cf. Ca.Ci.6.25. 128 Cf. Ca.Ci.6.26–32. 129 Cf. Ca.Ci.6.48. 130 Cf. Ca.Ci.6.50. 131 See Su.Ni.6.14–21. 132 Cf. Su.Ni.6.20–21. 133 This prose passage does not belong to the genuine text according to Ḍalhaṇa, who follows Jejjata in not explaining it. Compare on dhānvantaraghṛta: Cakradatta, prameha 31–38. 134 Cf. Ca.Sū.17.7, where the seven types of piḍakā are said to be mādhumehika. See the comments of Cakra, who argues that madhumeha designates prameha in general here. See also P.V. Sharma (1985e): 154–155. Compare Ca.Sū.17.78–81. 135 The rasāyanis are the dhamanīs transporting rasa, pitta, kapha and blood, according to Ḍalhaṇa. 136 Cf. Ca.Ci.16.70–71. 137 Glycosurias, in particular diabetes mellitus. 138 The same as lākṣā according to Ḍalhaṇa. 139 The text has tin, lead, iron, etc.; see Ḍalhaṇa, who completes the series. 140 Cf. Ca.Ci.1³.48–65. Add to the references: S.K. Chaturvedi and U. Pandey (1998). 141 See Ḍalhaṇa’s commentary on alternative interpretations of this difficult verse. 142 Kṛṣṇa should be addressed as the deity with conch, discus and club in his hands. 143 Ḍalhaṇa distinguishes six different uses of tuvaraka preparations described in this chapter (see his comments ad Ci.13.35). 144 See Su.Ni.7. 145 Cf. Ca.Ci.13.50–51, 54. 146 Cf. Ca.Ci.13.96–101ab.

Linked texts (3)