A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c33.569

v2.c33.569

208 E. Haas (1876a); (1877). 209 A. Müller (1880). See also G. Liétard (1883): 641–643; A. Weber (1914): 324–325. 210 J. Jolly (1901): 9–11 (C.G. Kashikar 11–13). 211 A.F.R. Hoernle (1978): 8. 212 See Su.Śā.5.18: the vedavādinaḥ proclaim that the bones are three hundred and sixty in number. S. Dasgupta (1975: II, 424) remarked that these vedavādinaḥ need not refer to Ātreya, but may designate earlier authorities, from whom Ātreya may have drawn his materials. See also Hariprapanna’s Intr. (68) to the Rasayogasāgara. 213 This thesis was disproved by A.B. Keith (1908). 214 G. Liétard (1858): 33; (1897b). 215 A.A. Macdonell (1971): 371. 216 See: Bower MS. 217 P. Cordier (1901a): 78–79. See also A. Roṣu (1989): LXXIII. 218 M. Vallauri (1941): 37. 219 O. Botto (1969): 321. 220 S. Ārya (1984): 21. 221 Ambikādatta’s Prākkathan (13) to ed. hh. 222 P.V. Sharma’s Intr. (VII) to the 4th ed. of ed. cc. K.R. Srikanta Murthy (1992a): 199. V. Śukla and R. Tripāṭhī (1982): 55. 223 Yādavaśarman’s upodghāta to ed. cc. 224 Bāpālāl Vaidya (1968): prastāvanā 28–29. 225 V. Śukla (1977): I, 74. 226 G. Mukhopadhyaya (HIM III, 576–581). 227 Jyotir Mitra (1976): 158. 228 Bhishagratna’s Intr. (7) to his translation of the Suśrutasaṃhitā. 229 Hemarājaśarman’s upodghāta (32) to his ed. of the Kāśyapasaṃhitā. 230 R. Śāstrī (1977): 349. 231 T. Śarmā (1981/82). 232 Gaṇanāthasena’s upodghāta (7) to ed. dd. 233 S. Dasgupta (1975): II, 424; Dasgupta adds that nothing can be said about the upper limit; he accepts Hoernle’s main contentions about Suśruta’s chronological position. 234 Satya Prakash (1965): 233. 235 Hariprapanna’s Intr. (69) to the Rasayogasāgara. P.K. Sanyal (1964): 54. 236 G.P. Srivastava (1954): 54–58. 237 Sūramcandra (1978): I, 257. 238 P. Rāy, H. Gupta and M. Roy (1989): 3. See for other opinions on Kātyāyana’s date: A.B. Keith (1973): 426; M. Mishra (1996): 21–22; Winternitz III, 390. 239 P.S. Sankaran (1976): 6–7. 240 Satyaprakāś (1960): 163–164. 241 Shiv Sharma (1929): 76. 242 S.N. Sen (1971): 53. 243 Su.Sū.1.40; 3.3 and 29; Ka.8.140. 244 Bṛhadyogataraṅgiṇī (1883: 647). 245 A similar table is found at the end of the Sūtrasthāna of the Carakasaṃhitā. 246 Noticed already by G. Liétard (1883: 647). 247 Śalya is said to be a subject pervading the whole treatise (Su.Sū.3.44–45).