A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c33.764

v2.c33.764

229 See: Vaṅgasena. 230 NCC V, 312. Compare on Gayadāsa: G.J. Meulenbeld (1974): 398–399; (1984a). 231 Called thus by Dalhaṇa in the introduction to his Nibandhasaṃgraha and also quoted by him as the Pañjikā. The kind of commentary called pañjikā is defined in Rājaśekhara’s Kāvyamīmāṃsā (2.7: viṣamapadabhañjikā pañjikā) (see N.V.P. Unithiri, 1980–81: 576); compare Hemacandra’s Abhidhānacintāmaṇi (ed. 1964; 2.170: pañjikā padabhañjikā). G. Hāldār (Vṛddhatrayī 197) also quotes some definitions of a pañjikā. 232 This unique MS was discovered in the Bikaner Collection in 1899 by P. Cordier (see A. Roşu, 1989: XCVIII); it is said to date from the end of the fifteenth or the beginning of the sixteenth century (P. Cordier, 1903b: 333). A copy of this MS forms part of the Collection Palmyr Cordier of the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris (see J. Filliozat, Liste Nr. 65). 233 Suśrutasaṃhitā, with the commentaries of Dalhaṇa and Gayadāsa, ed. by Yādavaśarman and Nārāyaṇa Rāma, Nirṇaya Sāgar Press, Bombay 1938. See: editions of the Suśrutasaṃhitā. 234 Cambridge Add 2491. This MS was studied by J. Jolly (1904) and A.F.R. Hoernle (1906a): 293–302. 235 Atrideva (ABI 200). D.Ch. Bhattacharyya (1947b): 141. P. Cordier (1903b): 331. J. Filliozat in L. Renou and J. Filliozat (1953): 159. G. Hāldār (Vṛddhatrayī 47). C.G. Kashikar (1977): 162. NCC V, 312. A. Pandey (1977). P.V. Sharma (AVI 209–210). 236 See Niścala ad Cakradatta, vātarakta 40 (= Ca.Ci.29.123). 237 G. Hāldār (Vṛddhatrayī 200 and 464) regarded Gayin as distinct from Gayadāsa; he identified him with Gayiśena, a physician with the epithet Kaṇṭhahāra, who lived in a village in Bengal called Viṣapāḍā in the eleventh or twelfth century; this Gayiśena is mentioned in Bharatamallika’s Vaidyakulatattva. These statements are repeated by Atrideva (ABI 201). 238 Compare Ādhamalla ad Śārṅgadharasaṃhitā 1.7.171cd–172ab and the Kusumāvalī ad Siddhayoga 70.4. 239 Ad Su.Sū.27.26. 240 Ad Su.Sū.45.157; U.1.4cd–8ab. 241 Ad Su.Sū.45.96 and 112. 242 Ad Su.Sū.45.157 (the Bṛhat- and Laghupañjikā are said to agree on the reading of the verse). 243 Ad Su.Sū.1.22; Ni.16.55–56; U.1.12cd–13 and 39–42; 6.11; 7.28; 11.6cd–10ab. 244 Ad Su.Sū.1.35; 46.162 and 468cd–471ab; Ni.13.37; Ci.33.33; U.3.3–4, 18, 19, 21; 5.9ab; 6.24; 7.6–7ab; 10.10; 15.30–33ab; 21.34cd–36ab; 39.116cd–119ab, 127–129, 146cd–149ab. 245 Introduction to the Nibandhasaṃgraha; ad Su.Sū.46.130–133, 141–142, 202–203ab. 246 ABI 200. AVI 209–210. G. Hāldār (Vṛddhatrayī 463). A. Pandey (1977). 247 See: Bhāskara. 248 See Dalhaṇa and Gayadāsa ad Su.Ni.13.37. 249 See: Candrikā. 250 Ad Śārṅgadharasaṃhitā 1.7.171cd–172ab. 251 Glosses ad Bhāvaprakāśa, cikitsā 3.146; 32.5; 34.2. 252 The Nibandhasaṃgraha contains more than one hundred and fifty references to Gayadāsa and Gayin. Dalhaṇa also quotes Gayadāsa without mentioning his name (see, for example, Su.Ni.9.27–28ab with Dalhaṇa’s and Gayadāsa’s comments). 253 Meghadeva calls him Gayin and Gayacandra.