A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c33.770

v2.c33.770

399 Ad Siddhayoga 70.48 (the same quotation as in Dalhaṇa’s comment on Su.Sū.16.19). 400 K.R. Srikanta Murthy (1992: 264) is in doubt whether the Lakṣmaṇatippaṇī consisted of glosses on the Siddhayoga or the Suśrutasaṃhitā. 401 P.V. Sharma regards the work as belonging to the eleventh century (AVI 212), probably because it is quoted by Dalhaṇa. 402 See: Mādhava and his works. 403 Ad Su.Sū.15.41. 404 CC: not recorded. Check-list Nr. 831. 405 Ad Cakradatta, mukharoga 32–33 (related to Su.Ci.22.32–33ab); Niścala mentions him together with Cakra. 406 AVI 179 and 213. 407 NCC: not recorded. 408 Dalhaṇa ad Su.Ni.13.3. 409 Dalhaṇa ad Su.Ka.8.5–8ab. 410 Bhānumatī ad Su.Sū.44.26cd–27. 411 Gayadāsa ad Su.Ni.6.15–19. 412 AVI 211. 413 A Śrīnandin, mentioned in Ugrāditya’s Kalyāṇakāraka, is certainly different from the commentator. Some are in doubt whether or not the Nandin who wrote a Yogasārasaṃgraha, commented upon by Pūrṇānanda, is to be identified with the commentator on the Suśrutasaṃhitā (AVI 211; V.P.P. Śāstrī, 1984: 387; compare NCC IX, 333: Nandiguru, Jain, author of Yogasārasaṃgraha). The same applies to the author of a Nanditantra (see NCC IX, 336: Nanditantra, on alchemy). A Nandin is quoted as an astronomical authority in Bhaṭṭotpala’s commentary on the Bṛhatsaṃhitā. 414 NCC XII, 153. 415 CC: not recorded. 416 Niścala ad Cakradatta, nāḍīvraṇa 16. Rāmadeva is absent from the list of authorities quoted by Niścala in G. Hāldār’s Vṛddhatrayī (52–56). 417 Cakradatta, nāḍīvraṇa 16 is close to Su.Ci.17.25. Compare Dalhaṇa’s comments. 418 AVI 213. 419 P. Cordier (1903b): 334: author of a Somaṭippaṇa. 420 S. Dasgupta (1975): II, 428. 421 The Somaṭippaṇa is quoted ad Siddhayoga 1.7; 80.1 (= Su.Sū.28.3; Dalhaṇa quotes Soma without mentioning his source), 4, 14 (= Su.Sū.29.27), 26–27 (Dalhaṇa and Soma are said to agree); 81.3 and 18; 82.2–3 and 8–9 (Soma is said to explain Suśruta’s text). K.R. Srikanta Murthy (1992: 264) is in doubt whether Soma wrote glosses on the Siddhayoga or the Suśrutasaṃhitā. 422 CC: not recorded. 423 See the introductory verses of his commentary on the Cikitsākalikā. The word sudhīra is sometimes interpreted as an epithet of Jejjata, who is also mentioned by Candraṭa; this interpretation is probably incorrect (compare B. Rama Rao, 1992: 304). 424 Ad Su.Ci.1.24cd–27ab, 72cd–73ab, and 74cd–75ab; U.58.58–65ab. 425 G. Hāldār mentions Sudhīra among Niścalakara’s sources (Vṛddhatrayī 56) and regards him as a twelfth-century commentator on the Mādhavanidāna (probably due to his presence among the authorities listed in the introduction to the Madhukośa);