A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c35.46.2

v2.c35.46.2

444 I.e., deafness. 445 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.226–229. 446 Cf. Su.U.21.57. 447 Cf. Su.U.21.56. 448 Cf. Su.U.21.39cd–41ab and 49cd–53. 449 Cf. Su.U.21.54cd. 450 Cf. Su.Ci.25.22–28ab. 451 Cf. Su.Ci.25.14cd–16ab. 452 Cf. Su.Ci.25.16cd–17. 453 Cf. Su.Ci.25.18–19ab. 454 The same as lehin. Cf. Su.Ci.25.19cd–21. 455 Cf. Su.Sū.16.27–31. 456 Cf. Su.Sū.16.32. 457 Cf. Ca.Ci.8.48–50 and 26.104–105ab; Su.U.22.19cd and 24.3–4. The Hṛdaya omits the prodromes of pratiśyāya (see Su.U.24.5). Pratiśyāya and pīnasa are two distinct nosological entities in the Suśrutasaṃhitā, whereas they are identical in the Hṛdaya (see Aruṇa ad A.h.U.19.9cd–12: duṣṭapratiśyāya = duṣṭapīnasa); the term pīnasa occurs at A.h.U.19.20, 20.1, etc. 458 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.105cd; Su.U.24.6–7ab. 459 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.106ab; Su.U.24.7cd–8. 460 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.106cd; Su.U.24.9–10ab. 461 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.107ab; Su.U.24.10cd–11. 462 Cf. Su.U.24.12–14ab. 463 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.107cd; Su.U.24.16cd–17ab (duṣṭapīnasa). The Suśrutasaṃhitā also employs the term duṣṭapratiśyāya (U.24.16ab). 464 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.108–110; Su.U.24.14cd–17. 465 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.111ab (kṣavathu = kṣava); Su.U.22.11–13ab (two types of kṣavathu). 466 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.111cd (ghrāṇaviśoṣa); Su.U.22.17cd–18ab (nāsāpariśoṣa). Caraka describes the disease as due to vāta and kapha, Suśruta adds pitta. 467 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.112ab (pratīnāha); Su.U.22.15cd–16ab (nāsāpratīnāha). 468 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.115ab (ghrāṇapāka); Su.U.22.8cd–9ab (nāsīkapāka). 469 Cf. Ca.Ci.26.112cd (parisrava);