A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.119

Language: English

v2.c37.119.1

1130 The quotation refers to A.h.Ci.14.35 (= *Cakradatta*, agnimāndya 2); Śivadāsasena refers to Vāgbhaṭa. 1131 Identical with A.h.Ci.10.91–93; the first verse, quoted anonymously by Śivadāsasena, is also identical with A.s.Ci.12.40. 1132 Unidentified. 1133 The second verse quoted is identical with A.s.Sū.9.25 = A.h.Sū.7.55cd–56ab; the first and third verses remain unidentified. 1134 Close to A.s.Ci.22.50cd–51ab and 55cd = A.h.Ci.20.31cd–32ab and 33cd. 1135 Very close to A.s.Ni.13.2–6ab = A.h.Ni.13.1–5ab. 1136 Absent from As.Ni.3 and Ci.3, A.h.Ni.3 and A.h.Ci.2. 1137 Identical with A.h.U.39.5–10. 1138 Almost identical with A.s.Ci.4.2–4ab = A.h.Ci.3.1–3ab. 1139 About the same as A.s.Ci.6.2–5 = A.h.Ci.4.1–4. 1140 One verse not traced; the remaining ones are close to A.s.Ni.6.7–11ab = A.h.Ni.6.6–10ab. 1141 Absent from A.s. and A.h. 1142 Close to A.s.U.9.29–30a-d = A.h.U.6.32–33. 1143 Very close to A.s.U.26.4. 1144 The same as A.s.U.26.31; compare Śivadāsasena's quotation from Vāgbhaṭa (A.h.U.22.41cd), who is said to follow Jejjata. 1145 Almost identical with A.s.U.26.16. 1146 Close to A.s.U.26.26. 1147 Identical with part of A.s.U.26.34. 1148 Close to A.s.U.26.36; compare Śivadāsasena's quotation from Vāgbhaṭa. 1149 Close to A.s.U.26.40. 1150 Unidentified. 1151 Identical with A.s.U.26.42. 1152 Almost identical with A.s.U.26.43. 1153 Very close to A.s.U.26.45. 1154 Almost identical with part of A.s.U.22.19. 1155 Close to A.s.U.22.10. 1156 Unidentified. 1157 Close to A.s.U.22.32.

v2.c37.119.2

1158 Close to part of A.s.U.22.37; this quotation is attributed to Vṛddhavāgbhaṭa in Śivadāsasena's commentary (ad karṇaroga 48). 1159 Close to A.s.U.22.38–39. 1160 Close to A.s.U.22.41. 1161 Very close to A.s.U.22.69. 1162 Close to A.s.U.22.75–76. 1163 Identical with A.h.U.16.9. 1164 Close to A.s.U.26.4. 1165 Very close to part of A.s.U.26.16. 1166 Very close to part of A.s.U.26.36. 1167 Identical with part of A.s.U.26.39. 1168 Very close to A.s.U.26.40. 1169 Almost identical with A.s.U.26.42. 1170 Madhyavāgbhaṭa had obviously the same verse as the *Hṛdaya*, with aileya instead of elā in 93a; aileya is a variant of elā (see ed. Kuṇṭe and Navre) and was adopted in the ed. of A.h.U. with the comm. of Śivadāsa. The verse is absent from the Saṃgraha. 1171 Identical with A.h.U.22.53–54ab. 1172 The quotation does not agree with A.S.U.22.41, which has jīvaka instead of jīraka. 1173 Unidentified. 1174 D.C. Bhaṭṭacharyya (1947a: 112; 1947b: 149) regarded the Svalpavāgbhaṭa as identical with the Aṣṭāṅgahṛdayasaṃhitā on the authority of Śivadāsasena's Tattvabodha ad A.h.U. 40.80. 1175 Almost identical with A.h.U.22.20. 1176 Very close to A.h.U.18.28. 1177 This quotation in verse is related to that from Madhyavāgbhaṭa in prose in Niścala's commentary. 1178 An author who abridged a large version of his work into a more concise one is Varāhamihira; Utpala quotes in his commentary on the Bṛhatsaṃhitā from the Svalpasaṃhitā or Samāsasaṃhitā (see A.M. Shastri, 1996: I, 17, 22, 39);

v2.c37.119.3

Varāhamihira also wrote both a Bṛhajjātaka and a Laghujātaka. 1179 P. Cordier (1901d): 150–151. 1180 *Bābhaṭa, Aṣṭāṅgahṛdayasaṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna, edited by Pañcānanagupta Kavicintāmaṇi, published by Bhuvana Candra Vasāka, Calcutta 1873. 1181 P. Cordier (1901d): 157–158. 1182 Ad Cakradatta, grahaṇī 76–84 (= ed. Ratnaprabhā 77–85). 1183 Hilgenberg and Kirfel (1941: XLIV) suggested the same for the transformation of the Hṛdaya into the Saṃgraha. 1184 P. Cordier (1901d: 151) also concluded that the works of Vāgbhaṭa, in the same way as the Carakasaṃhitā and Suśrutasaṃhitā, have been subject to a whole series of successive adaptations and revisions. 1185 Hilgenberg and Kirfel (1941): LI. 1186 See on the Tibetan translation: R. E. Emmerick (1977); J. Filliozat (1937): 123–132; C. Vogel (1965). The Buddhist elements of the Hṛdaya may well have been conducive to its influence on the development of Tibetan medicine (P. Cordier, 1901c: 183; R.F.G. Müller, 1932: 793). 1187 Vāgbhaṭa is supposed to have died on the eleventh day of the bright half of Māgha; the Aṣṭavaidyas render him worship that day each year in the residence of the Plantol family in Pattambi. 1188 See F. Zimmermann (1982), (1989): 233, 268. 1189 See P. Hymavathi (1993): 126–127. 1190 Anonymous (1964d). O.P. Jaggi IV, 28. R.L. Verma (1970): 352. A. Zahurī (1979a). 1191 The literature on the Rgyud-bźi is extensive;

v2.c37.119.4

see, for example: Bhagwan Dash (1976): 49–51, (1976a): 18–19, (1992): 454–455, (1994a), (1994b), (1995a), *(1995b), (1997), *(1998); N.D. Bolsokhoyeva (1993): V, 14–19; B. Clark (1985), *(1995); T. Clifford (1984); A. Csoma de Kőrös (1835); N. Dakpa (1979); Y. Dönden (1977); R.E. Emmerick (1975), (1977), (1978), (1983), (1987), (1990), (1990b), (1991), (1993a); *T. Fenner (1995); W. Filchner (1933): 362–375; J. Filliozat (1934b), (1937): 133–142, (1954); E. Finckh (1978), (1988), (1988a); S.G. Karmay (1989); C. Massin (1982): 67–82; F. Meyer (1981): 33–36, 80–81, 88–94, 98, 100–101, (1995); E.E. Obermiller (1989); A. Pozdneyev (1908); Rechung Rinpoche (1973): 10–11, 255–257; R.P. Steiner (1987a),