A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.119.3

v2.c37.119.3

Varāhamihira also wrote both a Bṛhajjātaka and a Laghujātaka. 1179 P. Cordier (1901d): 150–151. 1180 *Bābhaṭa, Aṣṭāṅgahṛdayasaṃhitā, Sūtrasthāna, edited by Pañcānanagupta Kavicintāmaṇi, published by Bhuvana Candra Vasāka, Calcutta 1873. 1181 P. Cordier (1901d): 157–158. 1182 Ad Cakradatta, grahaṇī 76–84 (= ed. Ratnaprabhā 77–85). 1183 Hilgenberg and Kirfel (1941: XLIV) suggested the same for the transformation of the Hṛdaya into the Saṃgraha. 1184 P. Cordier (1901d: 151) also concluded that the works of Vāgbhaṭa, in the same way as the Carakasaṃhitā and Suśrutasaṃhitā, have been subject to a whole series of successive adaptations and revisions. 1185 Hilgenberg and Kirfel (1941): LI. 1186 See on the Tibetan translation: R. E. Emmerick (1977); J. Filliozat (1937): 123–132; C. Vogel (1965). The Buddhist elements of the Hṛdaya may well have been conducive to its influence on the development of Tibetan medicine (P. Cordier, 1901c: 183; R.F.G. Müller, 1932: 793). 1187 Vāgbhaṭa is supposed to have died on the eleventh day of the bright half of Māgha; the Aṣṭavaidyas render him worship that day each year in the residence of the Plantol family in Pattambi. 1188 See F. Zimmermann (1982), (1989): 233, 268. 1189 See P. Hymavathi (1993): 126–127. 1190 Anonymous (1964d). O.P. Jaggi IV, 28. R.L. Verma (1970): 352. A. Zahurī (1979a). 1191 The literature on the Rgyud-bźi is extensive;