A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.216
A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.216
- Language
- English
v2.c37.216
143 Ad Su.U.65.29 (on the tantrayukti called vidhāna). This quotation puzzled P.V. Sharma (1986b: 78; Foreword to Bhagwan Dash, 1987), since the Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya does not deal with the tantrayuktis; he therefore supposed that Dalhaṇa does not cite the Padārthacandrikā, but some other work by Candranandana, which may be a commentary on the Suśrutasaṃhitā. However, it is quite clear that Candranandana did discuss the tantrayuktis ad A.h.U.40.78 (the footnotes in Kuṇṭe and Navre's edition of the Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya quote him on the subject).
Cites (2)
- Aṣṭāṅgahṛdayasaṃhitā — Vāgbhaṭa, Sanskrit
- Suśrutasaṃhitā — Suśruta & Nāgārjuna (siddha/alchemist), Sanskrit