A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.73

v2.c37.73

500 See about him: Mādhava. 501 See A. Siggel (1950): 1118. 502 A.h.Sū.2 is, for example, paraphrased in chapter 18. 503 P.V. Sharma (1968): 376; AVI 158–159 and 207–208. The same opinion was expressed by P.V. Sharma and G.P. Sharma (1972: 89). 504 See Cakra ad Ca.Ci.3.197–200ab. 505 Some examples are: Mādhavanidāna 1.4–15ab; 5.2, 10–23, 24cd–27ab, 42–44; 31.13–15ab, 17cd–20. 506 An example is Siddhayoga 58.82–83 = A.h.U.22.103–104. 507 See P.V. Sharma (1968): 425–427. 508 See: Garuḍapurāṇa. 509 See: Agnipurāṇa. 510 Viṣṇudharmottarapurāṇa, Brahmakhaṇḍa 56 (see L. Hilgenberg and W. Kirfel, 1941: XVII). 511 Since A.s.U.26.31 agrees with A.h.U.22.41cd, Śivadāsa's remark would allow to conclude that the Saṃgraha is also later than Jejjata. 512 See the commentary ad Āyurvedābdhisāra 102–105. 513 See Aruṇadatta's commentary. 514 This formula is found in the Carakasamhitā (Ci.30.90cd–96ab), where it is also described as being esteemed by Ātreya. 515 The Saṃgraha has a slightly different verse (Sū.17.18), which does not mention Caraka by name; it is, instead, introduced by: others again state (apare punaḥ paṭhanti). 516 These verses are absent from the Saṃgraha. 517 Cf. A.s.Śā.4.51. 518 The Saṃgraha (Śā.5.40) adopts Caraka's number without referring to Dhanvantari's opinion. 519 The Saṃgraha (Śā.5.44) does not refer to any authority by name on this subject. 520 Cf. A.s.Ci.12.16 and 19.6. 521 Cf. A.s.Ci.14.13. 522 AVI 159. 523 Compare A.h.Ci.11.16cd–17 and Su.Ci.7.3–4ab, A.h.U.39.145 and Su.Ci.27.6. 524 Compare A.h.U.5.49 and Su.U.60.55, U.16.28–29ab and Su.U.9.21cd–22, U.16.29cd and Su.U.9.23cd. 525 Some verses common to both works are: A.h.Ni.5.1ab = Su.U.41.3ab; A.h.Ci.20.34ab = Su.U.54.38ab; A.h.Ci.20.34cd = Su.U.54.37ab. 526 P.V. Sharma (1968): 32, 39, 117–118, 167–169. 527 AVI 161. Compare P.V. Sharma (1968): 117–118, 167–169. 528 P.V. Sharma points to A.h.Sū.2.20–46, which verses are very close to Śukranīti 3.1–32. 529 P.V. Sharma refers to an article by *Lallanji Gopal, Modern Review, May-June 1963. 530 P.V. Sharma refers to K-P. Jayaswal (1936). 531 AVI 160. 532 See S.R. Godbole, G.S. Pendse and V.A. Bedekar (1966): XV–XVI. 533 See A.h.U.40.41, where the sakalā kāmasūtravihitā raticaryā is mentioned; a variant of kāmasūtra is kāmaśāstra; Candranandana reads kāmaśāstra, Aruṇadatta has kāmasūtra. The other arguments are the same as those used in establishing that the Saṃgraha is later than the Kāmasūtra.