A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.77

v2.c37.77

635 G.S. Pendse in S.R. Godbole, G.S. Pendse and V.A. Bedekar (1966): XIV–XVII. Satya Prakash (1960): 193. 636 H. Parāḍkar (1939): 15. 637 Kiñjavadekar (see *Vṛddhatrayī* 283–284). 638 S.R. Jośī (1981): 149–150. Yādavaśarman’s upodghāta to ed. z of the *Carakasaṃhitā*, 15. 639 Gaṇanāthasena (1924): 54. 640 ABI 215–217. P.K. Sanyal (1964): 68. 641 Ratnākar Śāstrī (1977): 638. 642 Gulabkunverba I, 100. Haridatta Śāstrī’s upodghāta to the *Carakasaṃhitā* (ed. ee), page na. 643 K.R. Srikantha Murthy, Intr. to transl. A.h. I, XVII–XX. 644 L. Hilgenberg and W. Kirfel (1941) (based on knowledge in Persia and on Buddhist influence). 645 R.C. Majumdar (1971): 226. 646 Gulabkunverba I, 152. 647 O.P. Jaggi (1973), IV: 26. 648 C. Vogel (1965): 8–10 (based on I-ching and Firdaws). 649 H. Zimmer (1948): 58. 650 D.C. Bhattacharyya (1947a): 122–127, (1947b): 153. 651 D.Ch. Bhattacharyya (1947). 652 Umeśacandragupta’s Preface to his *Vaidyakaśabdasindhu*, 5–6. 653 See, for example, Jyotiṣacandra Sarasvatī’s upodghāta to ed. ff. 654 See, for example, Jyotiṣacandra Sarasvatī’s upodghāta to ed. ff. 655 See, for example, Jyotiṣacandra Sarasvatī’s upodghāta to ed. ff. 656 See C. Vogel (1965): 1–2. 657 A.B. Keith (1973): 510. B. Rama Rao (1992a): 209. 658 Jyotiṣacandra Sarasvatī’s upodghāta to ed. ff. 659 B. Rama Rao (1992a): 210. 660 B. Rama Rao (1992a): 210. 661 Hilgenberg and Kirfel (1941): XLVI–XLVII. H. Parāḍkar (1939): 23. 662 Compare H. Parāḍkar (1939: 23–24), who does not regard this disagreement as due to two different authors. 663 See also Dalhaṇa’s comments ad Su.Ci.31.7 and those of Indu ad A.S.Ka.8.27 and A.h.Ka. 6.23ab. See also N.S. Mooss (1984): 197–201. 664 Compare A.ś.Śā.1.27 and Ca.Śā.8.14, A.h.Śā.1.30 and Su.Śā.2.46. See H. Parāḍkar (1939: 23), who does not see this difference as an argument for assuming two different authors. 665 P.V. Sharma (1968: 12) claims that this disagreeing view is the same as that found in the *Suśrutasaṃhitā*. 666 The example referred to is A.h.U.40.81 (idam āgamasiddhatvāt pratyakṣaphaladarśanāt / mantravat samprayoktavyam na mīmāṃsyam kathaṃcana), which should be compared with A.S.U.50.158 (etad āgamasiddhatvāt pratyakṣaphaladarśanāt / prayojyam mantravat tantram tantrajñānavisāradaiḥ) and the original said to be found in Su.Ci.2 (not traced there). The single example given does not suffice to the validity of the argument, which is certainly void with regard to the *Carakasaṃhitā*. 667 See A.s.Sū.1.20 (na mātrāmātram apy atra kiṃcid āgamavarjitam). 668 See, for example: ABI 218; the translation of K.R. Srikantha Murthy.