A History of Indian Medical Literature v4.c57.197.4

v4.c57.197.4

He also mentions that a group of brāhmaṇas, who inhabit the Śekhāvaṭī area in Rājasthān and count many reputed vaidyas among their members, still have the surname Bheḍā. 271 See on Gandhāra: N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991); E. Brucker (1980); A. Cunningham (1871): 47–49; N. Dey (1979); Dowson; A. Foucher (1901), (1913); K. Karttunen (1989), (1997); B.C. Law (1984); A.A. Macdonell and A.B. Keith (1967); M.R. Singh (1972): 136–139; U.P. Thapliyal (1979): 19–20; Vettam Mani. 272 Gulabkunverba I, 119. HIM III, 528 and 541. S.V. Sharma (1963). G.P. Srivastava (1954): 34. 273 Aruṇadatta’s quotation ad A.H.Śa.5.30–32 = Bhela I.7.6; Hemādri ad A.H.Sū.7.73 = Bhela Sū.7.7cd–9; ad Sū.8.28 = Ci.10.44. 274 Yogaratnasamuccaya 2, svedavidhi 2cd–3ab is related to Bhela Sū.32.32cd; 2, vanamavirecanavidhi 26–27ab = Bhela Si.1.20cd–21; 6.28–30 = Bhela Sū.5.7, 9 and 8; 14.410–411ab = Bhela Ci.10.63cd–64; 15.51cd = Bhela Ci.12.1ab; 16.494cd is related to Bhela Si.5.30cd; 16¹.633–641 = Bhela Ci.25.1–8, with the exception of 16¹.635, absent from the Bhelasaṃhitā; 16¹.657–661 is undoubtedly a lost part of the same chapter, which is an important discovery, proving that copies of the Bhelasaṃhitā, more complete than the Tanjore MS, still existed in Southern India in rather late times; 16².30–35 = Bhela Ci.13.27–33ab (this quotation indicates that the correct name of the recipe is suvarṇasamjñākacūrṇa); 17.30–35 = Bhela Ci.13.27–33ab; 23.40–41 = Bhela Ci.8.19cd–21ab; 26.127–128 = Bhela Ci.27.17–18.