A History of Indian Medical Literature v4.c57.402

v4.c57.402

205 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 244: Pārā; N. Dey (1979): 148: Pārā; S. Saxena (1995): 506–507: Pārā. 206 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 194; N. Dey (1979): 105; S. Saxena (1995): 536–537. 207 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 288; N. Dey (1979): 204; B.C. Law (1984): 36–37, 330–331; S. Saxena (1995): 530–531. 208 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 138; N. Dey (1979): 70; S. Saxena (1995): 455–456. 209 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 211: N. Dey (1979): 119–120; B.C. Law (1984): 105, 288; S. Saxena (1995): 505–506. 210 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 232; N. Dey (1979): 138; B.C. Law (1984): 36 and 324; S. Saxena (1995): 507–512. 211 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 134; N. Dey (1979): 64; B.C. Law (1984): 152. 212 See B.C. Law (1984): 327 (Pūrṇa). 213 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 248; N. Dey (1979): 156. 214 See N. Dey (1979): 159. 215 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 178; N. Dey (1979): 97; B.C. Law (1984): 38 and 162–163; S. Saxena (1995): 498–500. 216 See B.C. Law (1984): 38. 217 See N.N. Bhattacharyya (1991): 244: Pārā or Pārvatī, 245: Pārvatikā; N. Dey (1979): 150; S. Saxena (1995): 506–507: Pārā or Pārvatī. 218 See A. Kumar (1994): 20–21; P. Tivārī (1989): 44–45, (1990): 181, 184. 219 See P. Tivārī (1989): 681. 220 Cf. Su.Sū.45.80cd–81ab. 221 Compare Su.Sū.45.213–216: tuṣodaka, sauvīraka and dhānyāmla are varieties of kāñjika (see Ḍalhaṇa’s comments). See G.J. Meulenbeld (1974): 454 and 467–468. 222 Not identified by P.V. Sharma (1997). 223 Regarded as identical with madhūlikā (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.) by P.V. Sharma (1997). 224 Compare Suśruta’s kudhānya group (Sū.46.20cd–21). See G.J. Meulenbeld (1974): 471. 225 Examples mentioned (I.20.4cd) are śūkara (the wild boar) and chikkara. See on chikkara: I.20.20. The chikkara is known to Varāhamihira (Bṛhatsaṃhitā 86.20; identified as the muskdeer or a civet cat by M.R. Bhat). 226 Examples mentioned (I.20.5ab) are śaśaka, śallakī, godhā, and mārjāra. 227 Cf. Su.Sū.28.6; A.s.Ni.1.19–31; Virasiṃhāvaloka; Yogaratnasamuccaya 9.15cd–50. 228 The initial fever is called mandajvara, i.e., a slow fever. 229 The concept of a disease that acts as the cause of a subsequent disease, thus resulting in a chain with death as the ultimate link (nidānārthakara roga), belongs to the common heritage of āyurveda; compare Ca.Ni.8.16cd–19, A.s.Sū.22.10, Mādhavanidāna 1.15cd–18, and the commentaries on these works. 230 The concept of a series of diseases called mahāroga or mahāvyādhi is common to āyurvedic literature. The members and their total number differ (compare Toḍara IV: 3.47; Rasaratnasamuccaya 21.1; Kalyāṇakāraka 11.4). 231 Compare on laṅghana: Ca.Sū.22, A.h.Sū.14, A.s.Sū.24. 232 This statement is remarkable in showing that the Hāritasamhitā considers saṃnipāta to be an involvement of four agents (the three doṣas and blood). More examples of this view are found at III.1.16cd–17ab, 106–112, 154, 173. 233 The category called sahaja in the Hāritasamhitā is called svabhāvabalapravṛtta in the Suśrutasaṃhitā (Sū.24.7) and svabhāva in the Aṣṭāṅgasaṃgraha (Sū.22.1).