A History of Indian Medical Literature v4.c63.50.4

v4.c63.50.4

Fortunately, Somadevaśarman is well aware of this problem and indicates in several instances that verses, taken from the Rasendracintāmaṇi, ultimately derive from earlier texts, such as Rasārṇava and Rasahṛdaya. 31 The Rasendracintāmaṇi is left unmentioned as one of Mādhava's sources in Gulrājśarmamiśra's commentary. 32 Numbered in agreement with ed. d. 33 Mādhava does not describe his treatise as a compilation, which it clearly is. 34 Āyurvedaprakāśa 1.16–18ab = Rasaratnākara I.1.27–29ab (not indicated in the commentaries); the same doṣas are found in the Rasamañjarī. 35 This classification is found in the Rasaratnasamuccaya. 36 These descriptions are from the Rasendracintāmaṇi and Rasacintāmaṇi according to Somadevaśarman. 37 Defined as a qualitative change in the commentary of Gulrājśarmamiśra (pūrvarūpasya rūpāntaraprāptiḥ).