Shringaraprakasha 10.p1.20

10.p1.20

599 - 601 anutpādanimittāsamabhavamaiṣedhikyāḥ, virodhanaiṣedhikyāścodāharaṇe. atra vicāraḥ. 602 - 4 guṇāsyāpi sākṣātkriyopayogitācodhyaparihārau. anvayaśabdārthaḥ. śākta vaibhakta śaktivibhaktimayabhedenānvayatraividhyam. 605 - 7 viṣayabhedena śāktodābaraṇāni. sambandha śeṣopapada saṃbodhanavibhaktibhiḥ vaibhaktodāharaṇāni. sambandhādibhiḥ śaktivibhaktimayodāharaṇāni. 608- 9 abhihitānvayānvitābhidhānayoranyatarāṅgīkāraḥ. anvitābhidhānavādimatopanyāsaḥ. 610 - 11 padasamūhātmakasya vākyasyaikārthābhidhāyakatvam. amavitābhidhānābhihitānvayapakṣayo- ssvarūpanirūpaṇeṇautityavicāratarcā. 612 - 13 abhihitānvayavād doṣodbhāvanam. anvitābhidhānavādisiddhāntāḥ. 614 - 18 padaiḥ kadambakarūpārthāpratipattiḥ. anvitābhidhāne śaktidvayakalpanāgauravā- sambhavanirūpaṇam. pradhānadvayaśaṅkyā''pāditavāryabhedaparihāraḥ. prakṛtipratyayoḥ padasya cābhidhāne dvirabhidhānadūṣaṇasyābhihitānvayavāde'pi taulyam. abhidhānānaṅidhānapakṣayoḥ prasaktadoṣaparihāraḥ. 619 - 23 kṛtārthatvanaiṣedhikyāḥ, parisaṃkhyānaiṣedhikyāḥ, niyamanaiṣedhikyāḥ, asaṃbhavaniyamasya, viśeṣapratyakṣaśca idāharaṇāni. 624 - 29 ākāṃkṣāyāḥ pratipattyajijñāsārīpatā. abhidhānābhidheyaparyavasānayoḥ jijñāsotpattisādhanatvopapādanam. anvitābhidhānapakṣavadabhihitānvayavāde'pi yogyādhyāhārāṅgīkaraṇam. gāmānayetyādāvākāṃkṣāṅgīkāre bhāṣyakārasammatiḥ. nirākāṃkṣasthale anvitābhidhānānupapattiḥ. yugapatpratiyogināmākāṃkṣānudayaḥ. 630 - 32 sannidhiśabdārthaḥ. abhidhānābhidheyaviṣayabhedena sannidhidvaividhyaṃ, sodāharaṇam.

599–601. Examples of prohibitive [mutual expectancy] based on the impossibility of a cause for non-production, and prohibitive [mutual expectancy] through contradiction. Inquiry here. 602–604. The objection and answer regarding even a quality being directly of use to an action. The meaning of the word "anvaya" (syntactic connection). The three-fold nature of syntactic connection through the division into semantic, inflectional, and made of both semantic power and inflection. 605–607. Examples of semantic connection according to the variety of objects. Examples of inflectional connection through case-endings expressive of relation, remainder, accompanying word, and address. Examples of connection made of both semantic power and inflection through relation and so on. 608–609. Acceptance of either the theory of association of the expressed or the theory of expression of the associated. Presentation of the view of the proponents of the theory of expression of the associated. 610–611. The sentence, consisting of a collection of words, as designating a single meaning. Discussion and critique of appropriateness by defining the natures of the view of expression of the associated and the view of association of the expressed. 612–613. Pointing out flaws in the theory of association of the expressed. The established conclusions of the proponents of expression of the associated. 614–618. Absence of cognition by words of a meaning having the form of a mere aggregate. Demonstration of the absence of the fault of heaviness in assuming two semantic capacities in the theory of expression of the associated. Refutation of sentence-split brought about by the suspicion of two principal elements. The defect of double denotation in the denotation of base and affix and of a word is equal even in the theory of association of the expressed. Refutation of faults applying to the views of denotation and non-denotation. 619–623. Examples of prohibitive [mutual expectancy] due to purpose having been served, prohibitive [mutual expectancy] through exclusive specification, prohibitive [mutual expectancy] through restriction, of restriction through impossibility, and through perception of a specific feature. 624–629. Syntactic expectancy having the nature of the hearer's desire to know. Demonstration that the completion of denotation and denotatum is the cause of the arising of the desire to know. Acceptance of the elliptical supply of appropriate words in the theory of association of the expressed just as in the view of expression of the associated. Agreement of the author of the Mahābhāṣya on accepting syntactic expectancy in cases such as "bring the cow". Inapplicability of expression of the associated in a case devoid of expectancy. Non-arising of syntactic expectancy simultaneously for correlatives. 630–632. The meaning of the word "sannidhi" (contiguity). The two-fold nature of contiguity according to the difference of scope regarding denotation and denotatum, with examples.