དན་རྣམ་པར་ངས་པ་ཞས་བྱ་བའ་ཆས་ཀྱ་རྣམ་གྲངས notes.139

notes.139

139. “Black” is not explicit in the Sanskrit (bhramara­sadṛśa­keśāś ca, Samtani 1971, p. 66). Samtani (1971, p. 66, n. 2) suggests that the gnag in the Tibetan could correspond to an additional asita in the Sanskrit, but parallels suggest that it is just a slightly explanatory translation, and it corresponds to this very Sanskrit. See for example Negi vol. 9, p. 3978, where the relevant Mahāvyutpatti entry (no. 342) is given.