དན་རྣམ་པར་ངས་པ་ཞས་བྱ་བའ་ཆས་ཀྱ་རྣམ་གྲངས notes.63

notes.63

63. Samtani (1971, p. 26, n. 6) suggests that reg par should be corrected to rig par, which would give suviditā and somehow be related to sudṛṣṭā (“seen it well”); he also reports that the manuscript that he calls N3 has a correction to sujuṣṭā. Having found a number of parallels where supratividdha(ā) is preceded by some form of dṛś, Samtani’s suggestion of sudṛṣṭā sounds like a good suggestion. However, the Nibandhana’s gloss to sudṛṣṭā is bhāvanākāle viśeṣotpatti­yogāt sudṛṣṭā | susevitety arthaḥ, which suggests that adopting the reading of the manuscript that Samtani refers to as N, sujuṣṭā, would be more sensible (in fact, sudṛṣṭā there hardly makes any sense). We propose to read sujuṣṭā in the Sanskrit and consider reg par byas as a possible translation of juṣṭā.