འཕགས་པ་དགངས་པ་ངས་པར་འགྲལ་པ་ཞས་བྱ་བ་ཐག་པ་ཆན་པའ་མད 100
Unraveling the Intent 100
- Language
- English
100
or in establishing categorical, analytical, interrogative, and dismissive answers as well as secret instructions.³²³
iii. “The faults of cognitive objects are the defects of phenomena related to affliction, which I have taught in several ways.
iv. “The positive qualities of cognitive objects are the benefits arising from phenomena related to purification, which I have taught in several ways.
v. “The methods for analyzing cognitive objects includes six points: (a) the method for analyzing the meaning of true reality; (b) the method for analyzing attainments; (c) the method for analyzing explanations; (d) the method for analyzing the elimination of the two extremes; (e) the method for analyzing the inconceivable; and (f) the method for analyzing the underlying intention.
vi. “The processes related to cognitive objects are the three times, the three defining characteristics of the conditioned, and the four conditions.
vii. “There are four principles of reason in the analysis of cognitive objects: (a) the principle of reason based on dependence, (b) the principle of reason based on cause and effect, (c) the principle of reason based on logical proof, and (d) the principle of reason based on the nature of phenomena itself.
a. “The arising of conditioned phenomena and the causes for their being expressed through conventions, as well as related causal conditions, constitute the principle of reason based on dependence.
b. “The causes that will bring about a result,³²⁴ a completion, or an action once phenomena have arisen, as well as related causal conditions, constitute the principle of reason based on cause and effect.
c. “The causes establishing the meaning and bringing about the valid understanding of the thesis,³²⁵ the demonstration, and the statement of a proof, as well as related causal conditions, constitute the principle of reason based on logical proof.³²⁶ This logical proof is, moreover, of two kinds: valid and invalid. Among these, five are characterized as valid³²⁷ and seven as invalid. What are the five logical proofs characterized as valid? They are the logical proofs characterized by (I) a perception that is a direct cognition of the thing to establish,³²⁸ (II) a perception that is a direct cognition of something existing in dependence on the thing to establish,³²⁹ (III) a demonstration through an instance belonging to the same class,³³⁰
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Linked texts (1)
- འཕགས་པ་དགོངས་པ་ངེས་པར་འགྲེལ་པ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་ཐེག་པ་ཆེན་པོའི་མདོ — Classical Tibetan