金剛般若經贊述 1.68

1.68

五、不失者，謂不失正道，此遮增減執也。謂於行所住處之中執有人、法，故名為增執；撥無真如妙法，故名為減執；若作此者，便失正道，今遮二執，故云不失。故論云，於中若說言，「如來說福德性，即非福德性」者，此遮增益邊，以無彼福聚分別自性故；若復說言，「是故如來說如來福德聚」，此遮損減邊，以彼雖不如言詞有自性，而有可說事，以如來說福德聚故，乃至云「所謂佛法者，即非佛法」，如是等皆應准釋名為不失也。

"Non-loss", the fifth, means not losing the right path; this refutes the graspings of addition and subtraction. Grasping that there are persons and phenomena within the dwelling places of practice is called the grasping of addition; repudiating the wonderful Dharma of tathatā is called the grasping of subtraction. If one does this, one will lose the right path; now both graspings are refuted, hence it is called "non-loss". Therefore, the treatise says: within this, if it says, "what the Tathāgata speaks of as the nature of merit is not the nature of merit", this refutes the extreme of addition, because that accumulation of merit lacks a conceptually differentiated intrinsic nature; if it further says, "therefore the Tathāgata speaks of the Tathāgata's accumulation of merit", this refutes the extreme of subtraction, because although it does not have intrinsic nature as words suggest, there is an expressible entity, since the Tathāgata speaks of the accumulation of merit; down to saying "what are called buddhadharmas are not buddhadharmas"—all such passages should be explained accordingly as being called "non-loss".