金剛般若經贊述 2.140

2.140

二者、因此破疑而起，說菩薩不見彼是眾生，不見存我為菩薩等者，是則如來不見故，名為無眾生等；為實無眾生等，故佛不見耶？

Second is the doubt arising because of this refutation: when it says that a bodhisattva does not see those as sentient beings and does not maintain the self as a bodhisattva and so forth, is it then that because the Tathāgata does not see them, it is called 'there being no sentient beings and so forth'; or is it that because there truly are no sentient beings and so forth, the Buddha does not see them?