金剛般若經贊述 2.37

2.37

The commentary says: According to Vasubandhu's commentary, this refutes the second doubt. A doubt arose, saying: "Earlier it was said that an animitta cause attains an animitta fruit, yet within the realization of the fruit there is no path; how can that [cause] serve as a cause for the fruit? The meaning of this text is: since the realized Dharma is animitta, how can practices such as empty quiescence and non-abiding serve as a cause?" It is to sever this doubt [that this is stated]. This text has two parts: first, clarifying non-false speech; second, dispelling external attachments. This is the first.